The eyes are windows to the soul, while a windshield is your window to the track and any hazards approaching. Being able to see as much as possible is almost always a good thing. That's why AcMo has developed the newest advancement in tear-off technology for windshields. I am proud to introduce the AcMo UV reactive tear-off. This is the only tear-off technology you'll ever need. Now you don't have to worry if half of the track is bathed in sunlight while the other half is dark. You'll still be able to see through a whole lap. This new technology will reduce the moment of abject terror that occur when traveling at high speeds when the brightness of the sun obscures all forward visibility. I'm assuming you're not like me, and that you keep your eyes open the whole time you're on track. These tear-offs can help with that. New excuses will need to be developed to explain why you aren't as fast as you should be, or why you ran into something that was quite visible.
I don't know what else I can say about these revolutionary new tear-offs. Oh, the materials used to create the tear-offs also renders them bullet resistant. I've been advised by legal that we can't say they are bulletproof for liability reasons. We don't expect gun fire to erupt at most track venues, but we find that the events you least anticipate are almost always the ones to occur.
We developed these tear-offs as a response to the inability of our transitioning visors to work when seated behind a UV blocking windshield. We knew there had to be a better way, and we believe we've found it. As always, we put our words behind our testing efforts. We know these work because we have the failures to prove it.
Several glass manufacturing companies have been in contact with us over the last few months. I'm not sure how they heard we were developing this technology. I suspect the mole has been leaking information again. I haven't been able to draw out this person, but I am hopeful that Compensation Package will do the job for me, and that Fred will then take care of Compensation Package. My sanity is dependent upon the situation unfolding in that exact manner. I am sore from sitting on top of my desk, and I could use some exercise, which I can't do from on top of the desk.
These companies have asked for detailed information regarding the development of our tear-offs. I don't think they believe we've done what we say we've done. I'm not stupid though, I'm not going to give them our plans. I know what they are trying to do. They all want to suppress the technology to keep ignorant drivers being blinded by sunlight. More crashes leads to more windshield sales. We know all about the financial metrics of crashing.
I have agreed to form a joint partnership with the leading consultant to the automotive glass industry to create new opportunities for this technology to be introduced to the pertinent motorsport markets. We have also considered designing a tear-off for use on fighter jet canopies, but we are having trouble keeping them affixed at speed. Also we have had a tough time figuring out how the pilot can remove the tear-off while at speed. We did some experiments using the downtime that occurs during aerial refueling, but that was a bad decision. We do now know that the tear-offs melt at temperatures above 1400º F. It is important to avoid that level of exposure at all costs because when it melts into the surface, it causes an unstable reaction. The film fluctuates between light and dark in an uncontrolled manner, which makes seeing anything almost impossible.
There are several ways to mitigate the damage of total visual obstruction, but we haven't figured out what they are yet. For now it is best to move as far away from the tear-off as possible if it begins thermal deterioration. This is one of the reasons we have delayed rolling out our fighter jet solution. None of the above mentioned issues should occur in a land based vehicle.
We developed these tear-offs as a response to the inability of our transitioning visors to work when seated behind a UV blocking windshield. We knew there had to be a better way, and we believe we've found it. As always, we put our words behind our testing efforts. We know these work because we have the failures to prove it.
Several glass manufacturing companies have been in contact with us over the last few months. I'm not sure how they heard we were developing this technology. I suspect the mole has been leaking information again. I haven't been able to draw out this person, but I am hopeful that Compensation Package will do the job for me, and that Fred will then take care of Compensation Package. My sanity is dependent upon the situation unfolding in that exact manner. I am sore from sitting on top of my desk, and I could use some exercise, which I can't do from on top of the desk.
These companies have asked for detailed information regarding the development of our tear-offs. I don't think they believe we've done what we say we've done. I'm not stupid though, I'm not going to give them our plans. I know what they are trying to do. They all want to suppress the technology to keep ignorant drivers being blinded by sunlight. More crashes leads to more windshield sales. We know all about the financial metrics of crashing.
I have agreed to form a joint partnership with the leading consultant to the automotive glass industry to create new opportunities for this technology to be introduced to the pertinent motorsport markets. We have also considered designing a tear-off for use on fighter jet canopies, but we are having trouble keeping them affixed at speed. Also we have had a tough time figuring out how the pilot can remove the tear-off while at speed. We did some experiments using the downtime that occurs during aerial refueling, but that was a bad decision. We do now know that the tear-offs melt at temperatures above 1400º F. It is important to avoid that level of exposure at all costs because when it melts into the surface, it causes an unstable reaction. The film fluctuates between light and dark in an uncontrolled manner, which makes seeing anything almost impossible.
There are several ways to mitigate the damage of total visual obstruction, but we haven't figured out what they are yet. For now it is best to move as far away from the tear-off as possible if it begins thermal deterioration. This is one of the reasons we have delayed rolling out our fighter jet solution. None of the above mentioned issues should occur in a land based vehicle.
No comments:
Post a Comment